Contact Complain-about-them.com
Complain-about-them.com
Why Does This Work? Because we have Companies
and Individuals begging us to remove these
complaints because it damages their business
The only FREE complaints site
that offers you
FREE Professional Legal Advice

Email:

Password:

» Forgot Password?
» Not a member yet? Sign Up now!

MAKE A CLAIM

Search Complaints:

» Advanced searching tool
» Browse Companies

Search Complaints

Search claims by the following criteria

Search by keyword: (search also in comments: )
Company name:      or     select company
Country:     City:
Select Company Type:

Sort searching results by:

COMPANY NAME
       DATE OF CLAIM
       NUMBER OF COMMENTS

Found: 1




IDCompanyClaim TitleAddedClaimsCommentsDetails
151

Comet [Hull]

Sale of Goods Act - "out of pocket expenses" »23/11/2009Total claims: 1
Comments: 0
Chest Freezer, bought 30/07/07, showed RED warning light mid Oct. 2009. Intial response from service dept. Comet: out of warranty. Quoted Sale of Goods Act 1979 (as amended) in writing, handed letter into London Romford branch (where freezer was bought and emailed copy as attchment to Comet HQ in Hull. - Was advised by Comet to book emgineer call out, had to pay £ 29.36 when booking appointment, i.e. in advance. - Engineer attended, inspected and declared freezer BER = beyond exconomical repair. Comet offered £ 120.00 = abt 2/3rd of sales price but categorically refuses to refund £ 29.36.
Latest answer from Comet: "... wea re not obliged to refund your inspection fee under this legislation, as we have no evidence to suggest that the cause of the fault was due to a manufacturing defect."

I am persuing a principal here: Comet intially and still trying very hard to mislead the genreal public by initially rejecting the claim alltogether (out of 1 year warranty), only reacting (positivly) with part refund under 6 year rule but still trying to reject claim for "out of pocket expenses" suffered due to manufactuing fault.

Would like to "throw at them" case law, i.e. judgements as near as possible to above scenario.

Thank you for your help.

Lutz Friedhoff

more details »